ATI Radeon HD 4855 vs Quadro FX 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1293not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.92no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG84RV770
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)3 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32640
Core clock speed460 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors289 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate7.36018.40
Floating-point processing power0.05888 TFLOPS0.736 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm220 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s115.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 3 January 2010
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 110 Watt

FX 1700 has 162% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4855, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700 and Radeon HD 4855. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4855 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 4855 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1700 or Radeon HD 4855, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.