GeForce 720M vs Quadro FX 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1282not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG84GF117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)1 April 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3296
Core clock speed460 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors289 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate7.36010.00
Floating-point processing power0.05888 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache64 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 1 April 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 33 Watt

GeForce 720M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 27.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700 and GeForce 720M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 720M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA GeForce 720M
GeForce 720M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 125 votes

Rate GeForce 720M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1700 or GeForce 720M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.