CMP 50HX vs Quadro FX 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1272not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG84TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323584
Core clock speed460 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors289 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate7.360296.6
Floating-point processing power0.05888 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cache64 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.17.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 250 Watt

FX 1700 has 495.2% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700 and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 60 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1700 or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.