GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 vs Quadro FX 1500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1319not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.47no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG71NV34 B1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors278 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.8001.000
ROPs164
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length173 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0a
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 150 nm

FX 1500 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1500 and GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500
Quadro FX 1500
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 35 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1500 or GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.