Radeon HD 7970M X2 vs Quadro FX 1400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1393not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV41Wimbledon
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 August 2004 (21 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280 ×2
Core clock speed350 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors222 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate4.20068.00 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.176 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs1280 ×2
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed300 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s153.6 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 200 Watt

FX 1400 has 264% lower power consumption.

HD 7970M X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1400 and Radeon HD 7970M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7970M X2 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 35 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7970M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1400 or Radeon HD 7970M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.