GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs Quadro FX 1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1367not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV41GT218
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 August 2004 (21 years ago)12 July 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed350 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors222 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2004.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 25 Watt

8400 GS Rev. 3 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1400 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
Quadro FX 1400
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 35 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1400 or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.