ATI WinBoost vs Quadro FX 1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1531not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.11no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameNV38Mach64
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 August 2004 (21 years ago)1 November 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed350 MHz40 MHz
Number of transistors135 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.800no data
ROPs41
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDREDO
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s320.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0aN/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 1 November 1995
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 600 nm

FX 1300 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 362% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and WinBoost. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1300 is a workstation graphics card while WinBoost is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate WinBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1300 or WinBoost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.