HD Graphics P4700 vs Quadro FX 1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1523not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.11no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameNV38Haswell GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 August 2004 (21 years ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data160
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors135 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate2.80026.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed275 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.14.3
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 130 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 86 Watt

FX 1300 has 56.4% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1300 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics P4700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300
Intel HD Graphics P4700
HD Graphics P4700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1300 or HD Graphics P4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.