CMP 170HX vs Quadro FX 1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1531not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.11no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV38GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2004 (21 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4480
Core clock speed350 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors135 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.800394.8
Floating-point processing powerno data12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s1,493 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0aN/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 250 Watt

FX 1300 has 355% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 21 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1300 or CMP 170HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.