ATI Radeon DDR MAXX vs Quadro CX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking901not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGT200BRage 6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed602 MHz148 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate38.530.89 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPSno data
ROPs242 ×2
TMUs646 ×2
L2 Cache192 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 2x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB32 MB ×2
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed800 MHz148 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s4.736 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video2x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 1 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm

Quadro CX has an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro CX and Radeon DDR MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro CX is a workstation graphics card while Radeon DDR MAXX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro CX
Quadro CX
ATI Radeon DDR MAXX
Radeon DDR MAXX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro CX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon DDR MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro CX or Radeon DDR MAXX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.