GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs Quadro CX
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 899 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | GT218 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 (17 years ago) | 13 June 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 589 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 260 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 4.712 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 0.04486 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 4 |
| TMUs | 64 | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 32 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 9.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 November 2008 | 13 June 2012 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Quadro CX has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
9400 GT Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro CX and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro CX is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
