ATI FireGL V3200 vs Quadro CX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking900not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGT200BRV380
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed602 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate38.532.000
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs644
L2 Cache192 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s11.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0b
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 46 Watt

Quadro CX has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V3200, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro CX and FireGL V3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro CX
Quadro CX
ATI FireGL V3200
FireGL V3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro CX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro CX or FireGL V3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.