Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.15no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGF110Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 May 2012 (13 years ago)13 April 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124480
Core clock speed651 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66707.0
Floating-point processing power1.3322 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs64280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cache896 KB2 MB
L2 Cache768 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2012 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 281 Watt

Quadro 7000 has 37.7% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 7000 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.