FirePro M8900 vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking542not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.16no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF110Blackcomb
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date2 May 2012 (13 years ago)12 April 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512960
Core clock speed651 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6632.64
Floating-point processing power1.3322 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6448
L1 Cache896 KB192 KB
L2 Cache768 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s115 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2012 12 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro 7000 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro M8900, on the other hand, has 172% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 7000 and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or FirePro M8900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.