TITAN Ada vs Quadro 6000 SDI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF100AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$11,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44818432
Core clock speed574 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)231 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate32.141,452
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS92.9 TFLOPS
ROPs48192
TMUs56576
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm336 mm
WidthQuad-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s1.15 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 231 Watt 800 Watt

6000 SDI has 246.3% lower power consumption.

TITAN Ada, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 6000 SDI and TITAN Ada. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 6000 SDI is a workstation graphics card while TITAN Ada is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
Quadro 6000 SDI
NVIDIA TITAN Ada
TITAN Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 9 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.