ATI Radeon X1600 PRO vs Quadro 6000 SDI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGF100RV530
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)1 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,499 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed574 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)231 Watt41 Watt
Texture fill rate32.142.000
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs564
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
WidthQuad-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz390 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s12.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 1 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 231 Watt 41 Watt

6000 SDI has an age advantage of 3 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1600 PRO, on the other hand, has 463.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 6000 SDI and Radeon X1600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 6000 SDI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1600 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
Quadro 6000 SDI
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
Radeon X1600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 9 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 133 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 6000 SDI or Radeon X1600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.