CMP 50HX vs Quadro 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1075not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.39no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF108TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 December 2010 (14 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed640 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors585 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate10.24296.6
Floating-point processing power0.2458 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache128 KB3.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro 600 2106
CMP 50HX 55928
+2556%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 December 2010 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro 600 has 525% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 600 and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 457 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 67 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 600 or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.