Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs Quadro 5010M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 740 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.11 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 (15 years ago) | 7 August 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1408 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1668 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 345 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 427.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 13.66 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 48 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 282 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 650 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 February 2011 | 7 August 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 345 Watt |
Quadro 5010M has 245% lower power consumption.
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro 5010M and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 5010M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
