ATI Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition vs Quadro 5010M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking740not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.11no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF110RV250
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)14 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed450 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate21.601.100
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs484
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 14 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 28 Watt

Quadro 5010M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5010M and Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5010M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 9 votes

Rate Quadro 5010M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5010M or Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.