Quadro 5010M vs FirePro W5170M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

W5170M
2015
2048 MB GDDR5
5.66
+23.9%

FirePro W5170M outperforms Quadro 5010M by 24% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking563613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.221.57
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTropoN12E-Q5
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years old)22 February 2011 (13 years old)
Current price$1530 $134

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 5010M has 614% better value for money than W5170M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate37.0021.60
Floating-point performance1,184 gflops691.2 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on FirePro W5170M and Quadro 5010M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 ECC
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W5170M 5.66
+23.9%
Quadro 5010M 4.57

FirePro W5170M outperforms Quadro 5010M by 24% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

W5170M 2191
+23.7%
Quadro 5010M 1771

FirePro W5170M outperforms Quadro 5010M by 24% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

W5170M 4197
+55.8%
Quadro 5010M 2693

FirePro W5170M outperforms Quadro 5010M by 56% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45−50
+18.4%
38
−18.4%
Full HD27
−119%
59
+119%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

This is how W5170M and Quadro 5010M compete in popular games:

  • W5170M is 18.4% faster than Quadro 5010M in 900p
  • Quadro 5010M is 119% faster than W5170M in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the W5170M is 100% faster than the Quadro 5010M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • W5170M is ahead in 58 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.66 4.57
Recency 2 October 2015 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

The FirePro W5170M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5010M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5170M
FirePro W5170M
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate FirePro W5170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5 votes

Rate Quadro 5010M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.