Tesla S1075 vs Quadro 5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking676not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF100GT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 July 2010 (15 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320240 ×4
Core clock speed405 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate16.2048.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs3232 ×4
TMUs4080 ×4
L1 Cache640 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2010 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 800 Watt

Quadro 5000M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1075, on the other hand, has a 128.6% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000M and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla S1075 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
Tesla S1075

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or Tesla S1075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.