Riva TNT2 Ultra vs Quadro 5000M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking615not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.66no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameGF100NV5 B5
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)15 March 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed405 MHz150 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.200.3
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs402

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2010 15 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 250 nm

Quadro 5000M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 5500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000M and Riva TNT2 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while Riva TNT2 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 Ultra
Riva TNT2 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 29 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.