Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 vs Quadro 5000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking682not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code nameGF100GMA 950
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 July 2010 (15 years ago)1 March 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204
Core clock speed405 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate16.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache640 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1792 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2010 1 March 2005
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 7 Watt

Quadro 5000M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, on the other hand, has 1328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.