ATI FirePro M5800 vs Quadro 5000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M and FirePro M5800, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro 5000M
2010
1792 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.27
+274%

5000M outperforms ATI M5800 by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6251007
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.693.80
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Madison
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)1 March 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320400
Core clock speed405 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate16.2013.00
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 5000M 5.27
+274%
ATI M5800 1.41

  • 3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 5000M 7767
+107%
ATI M5800 3760

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+257%
21
−257%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Valorant 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Dota 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%
Fortnite 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Valorant 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
World of Tanks 85−90
+190%
30−33
−190%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Dota 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Valorant 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Dota 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
World of Tanks 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Valorant 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

This is how Quadro 5000M and ATI M5800 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 5000M is 257% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro 5000M is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro 5000M is ahead in 41 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.27 1.41
Recency 27 July 2010 1 March 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 26 Watt

Quadro 5000M has a 273.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI M5800, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5
2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or FirePro M5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.