Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 513 MHz
- Max video memory 2.5 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 3000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x8
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 12000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance rating | 538 | 527 |
Value for money | 0.11 | 0.50 |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
GPU code name | GF100 | Navi 14 |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 February 2011 (12 years old) | 10 February 2020 (3 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | no data |
Current price | $1017 (0.4x MSRP) | $2381 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 352 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 513 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 152 Watt | 85 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 22.57 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 722.3 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 248 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2.5 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.0 | no data |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
Radeon Pro W5500M outperforms Quadro 5000 by 4% in Passmark.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro 5000 and Radeon Pro W5500M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 66 Mh/s | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 4.87 | 5.07 |
Recency | 23 February 2011 | 10 February 2020 |
Memory bus width | 320 | 128 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 352 | 1408 |
Memory bandwidth | 120 | 192 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 152 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro 5000 by AMD
The nearest Quadro 5000's AMD equivalent is Radeon Pro W5500M, which is faster by 4% and higher by 11 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro 5000:
Competitors of Radeon Pro W5500M by NVIDIA
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon Pro W5500M is Quadro 5000, which is slower by 4% and lower by 11 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro W5500M:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.