Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking675not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.35no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100Barcelo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 February 2011 (14 years ago)6 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352448
Core clock speed513 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate22.5750.40
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs408
TMUs4428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2011 6 January 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 448SP Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 237.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000 and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 34 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 50 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.