Quadro M3000 SE vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking627not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Power efficiency2.42no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF100GM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 February 2011 (13 years ago)2 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3521024
Core clock speed513 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate22.5734.56
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS1.106 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs4464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA2.05.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2011 2 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 75 Watt

M3000 SE has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 102.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000 and Quadro M3000 SE. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
Quadro M3000 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 31 vote

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.