ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3410 vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking692not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency2.38no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF100M82
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 February 2011 (15 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35240
Core clock speed513 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate22.571.600
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs444
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB256 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2011 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 7 Watt

Quadro 5000 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 3410, on the other hand, has 2071.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000 and Mobility Radeon HD 3410. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3410
Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 34 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or Mobility Radeon HD 3410, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.