FirePro S9300 X2 vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking675not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.35no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF100Capsaicin
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 February 2011 (14 years ago)31 March 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3524096 ×2
Core clock speed513 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate22.57217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4064 ×2
TMUs44256 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width320 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed750 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2011 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro 5000 has 97.4% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 34 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.