Radeon 740M vs Quadro 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.30
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGK104Phoenix2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateno data31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344256
Core clock speed797 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million20,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate89.2644.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs11216
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L0 Cacheno data64 KB
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1782 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.02 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2Motherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1751.3
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Quadro 4100 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4100 and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4100
Quadro 4100
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 177 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4100 or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.