ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra vs Quadro 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1147not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.06no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGK107Rage 4
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)16 June 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed706 MHz134 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Wattno data
Texture fill rate11.300.54
Floating-point processing power0.2711 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length176 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz134 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.26 GB/s1.072 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 16 June 1999
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

Quadro 410 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 410 and All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 410
Quadro 410
ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 410 or All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.