Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs Quadro 4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking806not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Power efficiency2.37no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF104Lucienne
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336512
Core clock speed475 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate26.6060.80
Floating-point processing power0.6384 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5632
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed625 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

Graphics 512SP Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000M and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 37 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 66 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4000M or Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.