ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs Quadro 4000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	809	1603
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.16	no data
Power efficiency	2.37	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GF104	RV280
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2011 (14 years ago)	1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	336	no data
Core clock speed	475 MHz	250 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.60	1.000
Floating-point processing power	0.6384 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	56	4
L1 Cache	448 KB	no data
L2 Cache	512 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	625 MHz	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	8.1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

71

no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p

6.32

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	22 February 2011	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	28 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---