ATI Radeon 9000 LE vs Quadro 4000M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking740not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF104RV250
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336no data
Core clock speed475 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate26.601.000
Floating-point processing power0.6384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 28 Watt

Quadro 4000M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 LE, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000M and Radeon 9000 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 9000 LE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
ATI Radeon 9000 LE
Radeon 9000 LE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9000 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.