Radeon HD 7570 OEM vs Quadro 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking770not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Power efficiency1.90no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Redwood
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 November 2010 (15 years ago)20 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256400
Core clock speed475 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt39 Watt
Texture fill rate15.2013.00
Floating-point processing power0.4864 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs3220
L1 Cache512 KB40 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm165 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed702 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.86 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 November 2010 20 March 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 39 Watt

HD 7570 OEM has an age advantage of 2 years, and 264.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000 and Radeon HD 7570 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7570 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000
AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM
Radeon HD 7570 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 202 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7570 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4000 or Radeon HD 7570 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.