Radeon R7 A260 vs Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF100Topaz
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 June 2011 (14 years ago)2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256384
Core clock speed475 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data980 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Wattno data
Texture fill rate15.2023.52
Floating-point processing power0.4864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs3224
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed702 MHz3.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth89.86 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

4000 Mac Edition has a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R7 A260, on the other hand, has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and Radeon R7 A260. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4000 Mac Edition is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 A260 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 A260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4000 Mac Edition or Radeon R7 A260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.