GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition vs Quadro 400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1264not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.81no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT216G96C
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 April 2011 (13 years ago)20 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4832
Core clock speed450 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors486 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2008.800
Floating-point processing power0.108 TFLOPS0.0896 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length163 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.32 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.21.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2011 20 January 2009
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro 400 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 56.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 400 and GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 400
Quadro 400
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 32 votes

Rate GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.