FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs Quadro 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1318not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.83no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGT216Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 April 2011 (14 years ago)1 March 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792 ×2
Core clock speed450 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors486 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.108 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs16112 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length163 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed770 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.32 GB/s240.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2011 1 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 375 Watt

Quadro 400 has 1071.9% lower power consumption.

S10000 Passive 12GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 400 and FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 400
Quadro 400
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Quadro 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 21 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 400 or FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.