GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Quadro 3000M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Quadro 3000M
2.63

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro 3000M by 1690% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking77463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.1446.41
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameFermiTuring TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years old)2 July 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$398.96 $499
Current price$447 (1.1x MSRP)$261 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 33050% better value for money than Quadro 3000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402560
Core clock speed450 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate18.00283.2
Floating-point performance432.0 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro 3000M and GeForce RTX 2070 Super compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 3000M 2.63
RTX 2070 Super 47.08
+1690%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro 3000M by 1690% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 3000M 1019
RTX 2070 Super 18245
+1690%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro 3000M by 1690% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro 3000M 7941
RTX 2070 Super 89209
+1023%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro 3000M by 1023% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro 3000M 1539
RTX 2070 Super 35032
+2176%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro 3000M by 2176% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro 3000M 3712
RTX 2070 Super 100123
+2597%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Quadro 3000M by 2597% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−165%
135
+165%
1440p4−5
−2000%
84
+2000%
4K3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1780%
94
+1780%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3367%
104
+3367%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−2260%
118
+2260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−1400%
180
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1580%
84
+1580%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4000%
123
+4000%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3633%
112
+3633%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2800%
174
+2800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−3420%
176
+3420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2675%
111
+2675%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1850%
117
+1850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1356%
131
+1356%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−11000%
111
+11000%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2900%
90
+2900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1960%
103
+1960%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−1058%
139
+1058%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1460%
78
+1460%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3800%
117
+3800%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3467%
107
+3467%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2767%
172
+2767%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2980%
154
+2980%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2075%
87
+2075%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1017%
67
+1017%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1267%
123
+1267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2917%
181
+2917%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−9500%
96
+9500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2067%
65
+2067%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1800%
95
+1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1360%
73
+1360%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3567%
110
+3567%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3167%
98
+3167%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2450%
153
+2450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1567%
100
+1567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1800%
95
+1800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1920%
101
+1920%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−530%
63
+530%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1333%
86
+1333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2350%
98
+2350%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−12400%
125
+12400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2650%
55
+2650%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−138%
19
+138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3800%
39
+3800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 23
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1250%
54
+1250%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−850%
57
+850%

This is how Quadro 3000M and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 165% faster than Quadro 3000M

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 2000% faster than Quadro 3000M

4K resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 1733% faster than Quadro 3000M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 12400% faster than the Quadro 3000M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2070 Super surpassed Quadro 3000M in all 53 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.63 47.08
Recency 22 February 2011 2 July 2019
Cost $398.96 $499
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 215 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro 3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4325 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.