NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs AMD FirePro M4100
Comparison of Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
17.6 GTexel / s
16.08 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x8
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
28.8 GB / s
64 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro 2000M 0.92
FirePro M4100 1.10 +19.6%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro 2000M 1261
FirePro M4100 1728 +37%
Quadro 2000M 1034
FirePro M4100 1059 +2.4%
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s −174.1%
74 Mh/s +174.1%
Let's see how good Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Advantages of AMD FirePro M4100
19.6% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (1 October 2013 vs 22 February 2011)
More pipelines (384 vs 192)
Higher memory bandwidth (64 vs 28.8 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
AMD App Acceleration
AMD PowerPlay power management technology
AMD PowerTune technology
AMD ZeroCore Power technology
AMD Enduro technology
So, Quadro 2000M or FirePro M4100?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD FirePro M4100.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro 2000M and FirePro M4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.