Radeon HD 7970 X2 vs Quadro 2000D
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 891 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.07 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.90 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GF106 | New Zealand |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 (14 years ago) | 31 August 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $899 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 2048 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 118.4 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.48 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | 292 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 3x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 650 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 264.0 GB/s ×2 |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 October 2011 | 31 August 2012 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 500 Watt |
Quadro 2000D has 706.5% lower power consumption.
HD 7970 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro 2000D and Radeon HD 7970 X2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 2000D is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7970 X2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
