RTX A40 vs Quadro 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking902not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.80no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF106GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 December 2010 (14 years ago)5 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19210752
Core clock speed625 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00589.7
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cache256 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length178 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz1812 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s695.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.18.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 December 2010 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro 2000 has 383.9% lower power consumption.

RTX A40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 2000 and RTX A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
NVIDIA RTX A40
RTX A40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 335 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 402 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 2000 or RTX A40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.