GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs Quadro 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking830not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Power efficiency2.74no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF106GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 December 2010 (13 years ago)16 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192240
Core clock speed625 MHz633 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt219 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0050.64
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs1628
TMUs3280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length178 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s127.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 December 2010 16 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 219 Watt

Quadro 2000 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 253.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 2000 and GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 308 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.