ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs Quadro 1000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10651602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF108RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 January 2011 (15 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$174.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors585 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate11.200.96
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs164
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 1000M 553
+27550%
Samples: 1117
ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.89no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 6−7 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2011 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

Quadro 1000M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 61% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 1000M and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 1000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 128 votes

Rate Quadro 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 1000M or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.