Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Playstation 4 Pro GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.50
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNeoCoffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed911 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate131.250.40
Floating-point processing power4.198 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs646
TMUs14448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth217.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Pro GPU and Iris Plus Graphics 645. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 4 Pro GPU is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 415 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 116 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.