GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Playstation 4 Pro GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.89
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNeoTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed911 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate131.272.00
Floating-point processing power4.198 TFLOPS2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz1751 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.6 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.11.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

Playstation 4 Pro GPU has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Pro GPU and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Playstation 4 Pro GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 429 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 616 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.