Arc Pro A60M vs Playstation 3 RSX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD2991DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date11 November 2006 (18 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed550 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors300 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rateno data166.4
Floating-point processing powerno data5.325 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2006 6 June 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 95 Watt

Playstation 3 RSX has 17.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 3 RSX and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 3 RSX is a desktop card while Arc Pro A60M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX
Playstation 3 RSX
Intel Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 81 vote

Rate Playstation 3 RSX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.