Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Playstation 3 RSX 65nm

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD2991Liverpool 16nm
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1152
Core clock speed550 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2057.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Lengthno data288 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A11.1*
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 75 Watt

Playstation 3 RSX 65nm has 29.3% lower power consumption.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 3 RSX 65nm and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 3 RSX 65nm is a notebook card while Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 65nm
Playstation 3 RSX 65nm
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 26 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.