Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs PG506-242

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated8
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.64
Power efficiencyno data15.77
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35846144
Core clock speed930 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speed1440 MHz2498 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt355 Watt
Texture fill rate322.6959.2
Floating-point processing power10.32 TFLOPS61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs96192
TMUs224384
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm287 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB24 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth933.1 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 3 November 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 355 Watt

PG506-242 has 115.2% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between PG506-242 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that PG506-242 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA PG506-242
PG506-242
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-242 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3528 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.