Radeon PRO W7700 vs PG506-232

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated43
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.94
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current priceno data$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843072
Boost clock speed1440 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate322.6499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/s18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth933.1 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 190 Watt

We couldn't decide between PG506-232 and Radeon PRO W7700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that PG506-232 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.